Is Article 8(3) EUTMR applicable only to identical marks? The General Court pitches in, but it is not the last word yet. - Kluwer Trademark Blog
Case T-44/20 Chanel SAS v EUIPO › Kanzlei Hoefer & Partner
Highly Reputable Trade Marks: Puma SE v EUIPO, A Case Study - Lexology
Are you XKING kidding me? Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM system - The IPKat
Relationship between trade marks and designs Dr Jur
Databases
French Government v. France.com: the European Battlefield
Well-known word marks don't prevent registration of same phrase in English - Commentary - Lexology
Comparison of signs in EU trade mark law
The Likelihood Of Confusion In The European Union Trade Mark Opposition Procedure – Part II - Intellectual Property - European Union
Judgment in Cases T-85/16 and T-629/16 Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v EUIPO › Kanzlei Hoefer & Partner
CITMA - Goodbye HelloFruity
Similarity of signs of a Union figurative mark - earlier mark unsuccessful - Legal Patent
Comparison of signs in EU trade mark law
When appealing bears fruit: Pear Technologies v EUIPO – Apple | ILN IP Insider
When appealing bears fruit: Pear Technologies v EUIPO – Apple | International Lawyers Network - JDSupra
No likelihood of confusion between BIM FREELANCE and BIM READY due to relevant public's high level of attention | World Trademark Review
CJEU rules on counteraction by conceptual differences in trade mark law, but leaves much to be resolved - The IPKat
NORWAY: District Court in non-EU country aiming with EUIPO Guidelines - Kluwer Trademark Blog
Nestlé wins in trademark dispute ONE: Renewed EUIPO examination flawed - Legal Patent
Chanel's logo and interlocking 3s (or Ss) – same overall impression? - Kluwer Trademark Blog
CITMA - BoA isn't backed up
Similarity of Union figurative marks - word element decisive - Legal Patent
CITMA - Making room for Messi
Sweden jurisdiction report: EUIPO's CF Similarity tool
The EU General Court on relative grounds for refusal: the Chanel judgment - The IPKat
